![]() ![]() I'm fairly fussy about sound, yet I enjoy my APP2s, even though I know they are some way off 'proper' ear/headphones (ie stuff that costs many hundreds, if not thousands of pounds). A lot of my older MP3 collection is pretty poorly encoded by current standards, but I can still enjoy the music. For the vast majority of people, I'd say no. The next, and possibly most important factor, is 'does it actually matter'. Now that's entirely subjective and everyone's ears are different, but I'd be confident that not many people over 30, or even 20, could tell the difference either. ![]() By 320Kbps, I could not tell the difference. And above 192Kbps, you need progressively higher quality hi-fi gear to actually discern any difference at all. ![]() I have done my own 'trials' with MP3 files at various quality, and 'lossless' music via CD. IE stuff that's superior to pretty much any wireless ear of headphones. Either a decent hi-fi set up, or some very good earphones. The problem with 'lossless' music, is that to listen to it in order to really hear the benefits, you need some pretty decent kit. Anderson said Apple was pushed to make this large improvement because it wanted "to give everybody an AirPods Max in their pocket." Apple says that ANC on the new AirPods Pro is up to 2x better than before. One of the most considerable improvements with the new second-generation AirPods Pro is better Active Noise Cancellation. "And at the end of the day, there is somewhat of a compromise, because you can't make it perfect for everybody yet," he said. Anderson revealed that Apple has a panel of "sound experts" that offer Apple's engineers feedback on audio quality. We don't think that the codec currently is the limitation of audio quality on Bluetooth products."ĭuring the interview, Anderson also offered an interesting look into how Apple developed the new second-generation AirPods Pro and how it validates sound quality. "We want to push the sound quality forward, and we can do that with a lot of other elements. So it's about making something robust in all environments." And the codec choice we have there today, it's more about reliability. Anderson added that even with current Bluetooth technology and codec standards, Apple can still make improvements in audio quality while the company's focus remains on reliability.Īndersen remains coy, saying that while audio quality is always a priority, "it is important to understand that we can still make big strides without changing the codec. In an interview with What Hi-Fi?, Apple engineer Esge Andersen, who works on the company's acoustic team, said that Apple does not believe that current Bluetooth technology is a limiting factor in audio quality for the AirPods. ![]() Apple Music offers lossless streaming which is 24-bit and up to 48KHz, and high-res lossless which goes up to 192KHz and requires an external digital-to-analog converter. Apple has previously hinted that it may develop its own codec and connectivity standard that builds on AirPlay and supports higher quality audio streaming, but so far has not made any such move. An Apple engineer has addressed the lack of lossless audio support in the second-generation AirPods Pro in a new interview.Ĭurrent Bluetooth technology in the AirPods lineup means that Apple's audio products do not support Apple Music Lossless audio. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |